Glossary

Loss on Drying (LOD)

Loss on drying is the percentage of mass a sample loses when dried under stated conditions. It counts all volatile matter, not just water, so the number means little without those conditions.

By Sunil Kumar, Managing Director - Sales · Updated 24 Oct 2026

Also called LOD

On this page
  1. 01Definition
  2. 02Quick facts
  3. 03Loss on drying on an API certificate
  4. 04How loss on drying is defined and calculated
  5. 05Why do the drying conditions matter more than the percentage?
  6. 06What does "dry to constant weight" mean?
  7. 07Is loss on drying the same as water content?
  8. 08How does LOD change potency and what you pay for?
  9. 09What should a quote request say about loss on drying?
  10. 10How Aarise Pharmaceuticals handles it
  11. 11Example
  12. 12Related terms
  13. 13Frequently asked

What is loss on drying?

Loss on drying (LOD) is the mass a specimen loses when dried, as a percentage of its starting mass.

Key takeaways

  • A bare LOD percentage is not a specification, because it includes every volatile.
  • In the four United States Pharmacopeia (USP) monographs compared here, in the editions named, LOD limits run from 0.5% to 2.0% under four different drying conditions.
  • "Dry to constant weight" means two weighings within 0.50 mg per gram of sample, the second after one more hour of drying.
  • At 2.0% LOD, a 25 kg lot holds 0.50 kg of volatiles, so LOD changes both potency and cost per kilogram of active.

Quick facts

Defined in
USP chapter <731>
Typical specimen
1 to 2 g, large particles crushed to about 2 mm
Temperature tolerance
Within ±2° of the stated figure
Constant weight
Two weighings within 0.50 mg per gram of substance taken
Water-specific alternative
Karl Fischer titration

Loss on drying on an API certificate

A certificate of analysis (COA) that reads "Loss on drying: 0.5%" tells you less than it seems to. Testosterone cypionate and methyltestosterone are both steroid active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), yet their limits in the United States Pharmacopeia editions read for this entry are 0.5% and 2.0%, set under different drying conditions.

Three kinds of reader use the term. An analyst running the weighing-bottle test (a covered glass bottle in which the sample is weighed before and after drying) needs the procedure. A formulator correcting a batch needs the effect on potency. A buyer comparing quotes needs to know whether the number is water, and what it costs in active ingredient. They often talk past each other because the percentage looks the same in every case.

This entry gives the definition and formula, the rules that make a result reproducible, the difference from water content by Karl Fischer titration, and a clause to paste into a quote request. The limits quoted come from published monographs, and each states the edition it was read from.

How loss on drying is defined and calculated

The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) chapter <731> defines it as "the amount of volatile matter of any kind that is driven off under the conditions specified" (USP 35 <731>).

LOD % = (W_before − W_after) ÷ (W_before − tare) × 100, where W is the weight of bottle plus sample.

Dividing by the filled bottle's weight instead of the sample's is an easy slip to make.

Why do the drying conditions matter more than the percentage?

The same percentage means different things under different conditions, so a monograph always pairs the limit with temperature, time and apparatus. The table compares four monographs, linked in the sources list.

Limits are as printed in the editions named, read in October 2026. The three steroid APIs and one oral API shown come from monograph pages that could be read in full; this is a comparison of four monographs, not a survey.

Chapter <731> also fixes the procedure (USP 35 <731>):

  • Use a 1 to 2 g specimen, with large particles crushed to about 2 mm.
  • Pre-dry the weighing bottle for about 30 minutes under the same conditions.
  • Spread the sample to about 5 mm deep, never more than 10 mm.
  • Hold the temperature within ±2° of the stated figure.
  • Close the bottle promptly and cool it in a desiccator before weighing.
  • If the substance melts below the drying temperature, first hold it 1 to 2 hours at 5 to 10° below its melting point.

USP posted a Notice of Intent to Revise <731> on 28 June 2024 as an in-process revision, aimed at allowing modern technologies such as moisture analyzers (USP notice).

The European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) names its own modes, such as "in vacuo" at 1.5 to 2.5 kilopascals (kPa) (Ph. Eur. 7.0, 2.2.32).

API
Testosterone
Drying condition
Vacuum over phosphorus pentoxide, 4 h
Limit
≤1.0%
Edition
USP 35 monograph
API
Testosterone cypionate
Drying condition
Vacuum over silica gel, 4 h
Limit
≤0.5%
Edition
USP 35 monograph
API
Methyltestosterone
Drying condition
105 °C, 4 h
Limit
≤2.0%
Edition
USP 32 monograph
API
Metformin hydrochloride
Drying condition
105 °C, 5 h
Limit
≤0.5%
Edition
USP 29 monograph
LOD limits and drying conditions in four monographs

What does "dry to constant weight" mean?

"Dried to constant weight" means two consecutive weighings differ by no more than 0.50 mg per gram of substance taken, the second after an additional hour of drying (USP General Notices). The rule sits in the General Notices, not in each monograph, which is why it is hard to find. It applies only when the monograph uses that phrase. Otherwise you dry for the stated time.

With a 2.0000 g specimen the allowance is 1.00 mg. Weighings of 31.4262 g and then 31.4258 g differ by 0.4 mg: pass. Weighings of 31.4262 g and 31.4245 g differ by 1.7 mg: dry another hour. It is not a 10% tolerance on the specification, and it is not a check that the bottle has cooled. The desiccator step handles cooling.

Is loss on drying the same as water content?

No. LOD counts everything that leaves on heating, while Karl Fischer (KF) titration reacts chemically with water only. USP <921> reserves the "Loss on drying" heading for cases where "the loss sustained on heating may be not entirely water" (USP 29 <921>).

For new drug substances, the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guideline Q6A says LOD "may be considered adequate; however, a detection procedure that is specific for water (e.g., Karl Fischer titration) is preferred" (ICH Q6A).

Where residual solvent or a hydrate is plausible, LOD and KF water are best reported separately. Any gap between them should be explained in writing, naming the solvent or other volatile. Residue on ignition is a different test again, listed as its own line, such as ≤0.2% for testosterone cypionate (USP 35 monograph).

How does LOD change potency and what you pay for?

Potency as received falls by the LOD, because volatiles carry no active ingredient. As-is potency = dried-basis assay × (1 − LOD ÷ 100), because the assay is expressed on the dried material. This is a model, not an official figure, using USP 35 values:

  • Testosterone cypionate: 97.0% × (1 − 0.005) = 96.5% at the limits.
  • Testosterone: 97.0% × (1 − 0.01) = 96.0%.
  • A 25 kg lot at 2.0% LOD holds 0.50 kg of volatiles. Cost per kilogram of active rises by 1 ÷ 0.98 = 1.0204, about 2.04%.

The dried-basis assay range of 97.0% to 103.0% is given in USP 35. See assay on anhydrous basis for how the basis is stated.

What should a quote request say about loss on drying?

State the method, conditions, limit and potency basis in the request, then test the COA against five checks:

  1. Method and edition. Pass: it names a compendium and edition year. Fail: "LOD: 0.3%" alone.
  2. Conditions. Pass: temperature, time, vacuum or desiccant, and specimen size are all printed. Fail: any is missing.
  3. Limit. Pass: the result meets the monograph limit or your tighter one. Fail: the result exceeds the limit or no limit is printed.
  4. Potency basis. Pass: dried-basis × (1 − LOD ÷ 100) reproduces the as-is figure within rounding. Fail: only one basis is given.
  5. Water. Pass: KF water is reported, and LOD minus KF water is explained in writing (solvent or other volatile named). Fail: no KF value, or an unexplained gap.

Clause to paste: "Loss on drying per [USP <731> or Ph. Eur. 2.2.32, edition year], [temperature, time, vacuum or desiccant], not more than [x]%. Report potency on the dried basis and as received. Report water by Karl Fischer separately."

How Aarise Pharmaceuticals handles it

Aarise Pharmaceuticals' quote requests ask for product or Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) number, quantity, destination, grade or purity, documents, payment terms and Incoterms (international delivery terms); the loss on drying clause goes in the documents line. It supports sample and evaluation quantities for qualified B2B buyers, subject to the API, availability and applicable regulatory requirements. COA, specifications and safety data sheets (SDS/MSDS) are available where applicable, and are confirmed product by product at enquiry. Requests go through its contact form, where phone, WhatsApp and email details are listed.

Example

Take a 2.0000 g specimen in a bottle with a tare of 29.4562 g, so bottle plus sample weighs 31.4562 g. After drying it weighs 31.4262 g, a loss of 0.0300 g, so LOD = 0.0300 ÷ 2.0000 × 100 = 1.50%. Dividing by the filled bottle's weight instead of the sample's gives 0.095%, about 16 times too low. These are illustrative numbers, not a lab result.

Frequently asked

Only if the moisture analyzer has been validated as equivalent to the compendial oven method for that material. Until then, an oven that meets the stated method conditions should be kept for official results. USP posted a notice of intent in June 2024 to revise chapter <731> so that modern technologies such as moisture analyzers can be allowed.
There is no universal value; each monograph sets its own limit. In the editions compared in this entry, testosterone cypionate and metformin hydrochloride allow 0.5%, testosterone 1.0% and methyltestosterone 2.0%, each under different drying conditions. A COA result should be compared with the limit for that specific API and those specific drying conditions.
Usually because a controlled variable differed between the two labs. USP <731> fixes the temperature within ±2°, the specimen size, the bed depth, a pre-dried weighing bottle and cooling in a desiccator. Drift in any one of these, such as a thicker sample layer or a slower transfer to the desiccator, can shift the measured percentage.
No. Residue on ignition weighs what remains after a sample is ignited, and it appears as its own separate line in a monograph, for example 0.2% or less for testosterone cypionate. Loss on drying measures instead what leaves the sample under the stated drying conditions. The two tests answer different questions and are reported separately.

Sources

  1. 1.USP 35 <731> Loss on Drying, United States Pharmacopeia (standards body), official May 1, 2012
  2. 2.USP notice: Notice of Intent to Revise <731> Loss on Drying, United States Pharmacopeia (standards body), 28 June 2024
  3. 3.USP 35 Testosterone and Testosterone Cypionate monographs, United States Pharmacopeia (standards body)
  4. 4.USP 32 Methyltestosterone monograph, United States Pharmacopeia (standards body)
  5. 5.USP 29 Metformin Hydrochloride monograph, United States Pharmacopeia (standards body)
  6. 6.USP 29 <921> Water Determination, United States Pharmacopeia (standards body)
  7. 7.USP 29 General Notices, United States Pharmacopeia (standards body)
  8. 8.European Pharmacopoeia 7.0, 2.2.32 Loss on drying, European Pharmacopoeia (independent pharmacopoeial standard)
  9. 9.ICH Q6A Specifications, International Council for Harmonisation (ICH), regulatory guideline
  10. 10.Loss on Drying (USP <731>): Method and Validation, Lab Manager, 2026

Talk to our team

Leave your details and we'll get back to you.

Aarise Pharma.

© 2026 Aarise Pharma

Powered by PageLens.ai

Get in touch — we'd love to help.

Contact us